An evaluation study of EGFR mutation tests utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer in the diagnostic setting
Menée sur 165 patients atteints d'un cancer avancé du poumon non à petites cellules, cette étude évalue et compare les performances de cinq tests de détection d'une mutation du gène EGFR
Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is predictive for the efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We evaluated the performance, sensitivity, and concordance between five EGFR tests.Materials and methods DNA admixtures (n = 34; 1%–50% mutant plasmid DNA) and samples from NSCLC patients [116 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue, 29 matched bronchofiberscopic brushing (BB) cytology, and 20 additional pleural effusion (PE) cytology samples] were analyzed. EGFR mutation tests were PCR-Invader®, peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp, direct sequencing, Cycleave™, and Scorpion Amplification Refractory Mutation System (ARMS)®. Analysis success, mutation status, and concordance rates were assessed.Results All tests except direct sequencing detected four mutation types at ≥1% mutant DNA. Analysis success rates were 91.4%–100% (FFPE) and 100% (BB and PE cytology), respectively. Inter-assay concordance rates of successfully analyzed samples were 94.3%–100% (FFPE; kappa coefficients: 0.88–1.00), 93.1%–100% (BB cytology; 0.86–1.00), and 85.0%–100% (PE cytology; 0.70–1.00), and 93.1%–96.6% (0.86–0.93) between BB cytology and matched FFPE.Conclusions All EGFR assays carried out comparably in the analysis of FFPE and cytology samples. Cytology-derived DNA is a viable alternative to FFPE samples for analyzing EGFR mutations.
Annals of Oncology , résumé, 2012