Performance of Lung-RADS in the National Lung Screening Trial: A Retrospective Assessment
Menée à partir des données du "National Lung Screening Trial" portant sur 26 722 personnes ayant une pratique tabagique ou ayant récemment arrêté de fumer (âge : de 55 à 74 ans), cette étude évalue la performance des critères du système de classification Lung-RADS (Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System) pour détecter un cancer du poumon à l'aide d'une tomographie numérique à faible dose de rayonnements
Background : Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been recommended, based primarily on the results of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST). The American College of Radiology recently released Lung-RADS, a classification system for LDCT lung cancer screening.
Objective : To retrospectively apply the Lung-RADS criteria to the NLST.
Design : Secondary analysis of a group from a randomized trial.
Setting : 33 U.S. screening centers.
Patients : Participants were randomly assigned to the LDCT group of the NLST, were aged 55 to 74 years, had at least a 30–pack-year history of smoking, and were current smokers or had quit within the past 15 years.
Intervention : 3 annual LDCT lung cancer screenings.
Measurements : Lung-RADS classifications for LDCT screenings. Lung-RADS categories 1 to 2 constitute negative screening results, and categories 3 to 4 constitute positive results.
Results : Of 26 722 LDCT group participants, 26 455 received a baseline screen; 48 671 screenings were done after baseline. At baseline, the false-positive result rate (1 minus the specificity rate) for Lung-RADS was 12.8% (95% CI, 12.4% to 13.2%) versus 26.6% (CI, 26.1% to 27.1%) for the NLST; after baseline, the false-positive result rate was 5.3% (CI, 5.1% to 5.5%) for Lung-RADS versus 21.8% (CI, 21.4% to 22.2%) for the NLST. Baseline sensitivity was 84.9% (CI, 80.8% to 89.0%) for Lung-RADS compared with 93.5% (CI, 90.7% to 96.3%) for the NLST, and sensitivity after baseline was 78.6% (CI, 74.6% to 82.6%) for Lung-RADS versus 93.8% (CI, 91.4% to 96.1%) for the NLST.
Limitation : Lung-RADS criteria were applied retrospectively.
Conclusion : Lung-RADS may substantially reduce the false-positive result rate; however, sensitivity is also decreased. The effect of using Lung-RADS criteria in clinical practice must be carefully studied.
Primary Funding Source : National Institutes of Health.
Annals of Internal Medicine , résumé, 2014