• Traitements

  • Traitements systémiques : applications cliniques

  • Leucémie

Phase III Open-Label Randomized Study of Cytarabine in Combination With Amonafide L-Malate or Daunorubicin As Induction Therapy for Patients With Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Mené sur 216 patients atteints d'une leucémie myéloïde aiguë secondaire (c'est-à-dire survenant après un syndrome myélodysplasique ou après une chimiothérapie), cet essai de phase III évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue du taux de rémission complète, et la toxicité d'un traitement d'induction combinant cytarabine et malate-L d'amonafide

Purpose : Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), defined as AML arising after a prior myelodysplastic syndrome or after antineoplastic therapy, responds poorly to current therapies. It is often associated with adverse karyotypic abnormalities and overexpression of proteins that mediate drug resistance. We performed a phase III trial to determine whether induction therapy with cytarabine and amonafide L-malate, a DNA intercalator and non–ATP-dependent topoisomerase II inhibitor that evades drug resistance mechanisms, yielded a superior complete remission rate than standard therapy with cytarabine and daunorubicin in sAML. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated sAML were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to cytarabine 200 mg/m2 continuous intravenous (IV) infusion once per day on days 1 to 7 plus either amonafide 600 mg/m2 IV over 4 hours on days 1 to 5 (A + C arm) or daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 IV over 30 minutes once per day on days 1 to 3 (D + C arm). Results : The complete remission (CR) rate was 46% (99 of 216 patients) in A + C arm and 45% (97 of 217 patients) in D + C arm (P = .81). The 30- and 60-day mortality rates were 19% and 28% in A + C arm and 13% and 21% in D + C arm, respectively. Conclusion : Induction treatment with A + C did not improve the CR rate compared with D + C in patients with sAML.

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Voir le bulletin