A randomized, open-label non-inferiority study to compare palonosetron and ondansetron for prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting in children with cancer receiving moderate or high emetogenic chemotherapy
Mené sur 108 patients pédiatriques atteints de cancer (âge : 2 à 18 ans), cet essai randomisé compare l'efficacité, du point de vue du taux de réponse complète, du palonosétron et de l'ondansétron pour prévenir les vomissements aigus induits par une chimiothérapie moyennement ou hautement émétisante, et analyse les coûts associés à l'administration de ces agents antiémétiques
Background : Chemotherapy-induced vomiting is a common adverse effect of cancer treatment. We assessed the non-inferiority of palonosetron versus ondansetron in prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting in children with cancer in 2–18 years of age. Methods : In this single-center, open-label, randomized study, children receiving moderate and high emetogenic chemotherapy were assigned to get either ondansetron or palonosetron in addition to other antiemetic prophylaxis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of children with complete response during the acute phase of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle. Non-inferiority was assessed by demonstration of lower limit of the 97.5% confidence interval for differences in complete response rates in palonosetron arm to be superior by − 15%. Risk factors for suboptimal response and the cost of administration of two drugs were also analyzed. Results : A total of 108 children were analyzed and various factors likely to influence response were equally distributed in two arms. These 108 patients received 412 blocks of chemotherapy. During the acute phase, complete responses were recorded in 72.2% (39/54) and 83.3% (45/54) receiving ondansetron and palonosetron, respectively (
ΔCR +
11.1%). The lower limit of 97.5% confidence interval (− 6.95–28.39) for this difference was greater than − 15% in palonosetron arm. Only statistically significant risk factor that predisposed response was use of dexamethasone (p value < 0.01). The cost associated with ondansetron administration was significantly higher compared to palonosetron. Conclusion : Palonosetron is non-inferior and cost-effective compared to ondansetron for prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV) in children receiving moderate and high emetogenic chemotherapy.