How does information on the harms and benefits of cervical cancer screening alter the intention to be screened ? : a randomized survey of Norwegian women
Menée en Norvège à partir d'une enquête en ligne auprès de 1 060 participantes âgées de 25 à 69 ans, cette étude analyse l'effet, sur leur intention de participer aux programmes de dépistage du cancer du col de l'utérus, de lettres d'invitation ou de recommandations comportant des informations sur les risques associés aux examens de dépistage et aux traitements des lésions pré-cancéreuses détectées
Cervical cancer (CC) is the 13th most frequent cancer among women in Norway, but the third most common among women aged 25–49 years. The national screening program sends information letters to promote screening participation. We aimed to evaluate how women’s stated intention to participate in screening and pursue treatment changed with the provision of additional information on harms associated with screening, and to assess women’s preferences on the timing and source of such information. We administered a web-based questionnaire to a panel of Norwegian women aged 25–69 years and randomized into three groups on the basis of when in the screening process additional information was introduced: (i) invited for routine screening, (ii) recommended an additional test following detection of cellular abnormalities, and (iii) recommended precancer treatment. A fourth (control) group did not receive any additional information. Results show that among 1060 respondents, additional information did not significantly alter women’s stated intentions to screen. However, it created decision uncertainty on when treatment was recommended (8.76–9.09 vs. 9.40; 10-point Likert scale; P=0.004). Over 80% of women favored receiving information on harms and 59% preferred that information come from a qualified public health authority. Nearly 90% of women in all groups overestimated women’s lifetime risk of CC. In conclusion, additional information on harms did not alter Norwegian women’s stated intention to screen for CC; yet, it resulted in greater decision uncertainty to undergo precancer treatment. Incorporating information on harms into invitation letters is warranted as it would increase women’s ability to make informed choices.
European Journal of Cancer Prevention , résumé, 2017