25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels in patients with high risk resected melanoma treated in an adjuvant bevacizumab trial
Menée à partir de données portant sur 341 patients atteints d'un mélanome de stade IIB-IIIC à haut risque et ayant été réséqué, cette étude de cohorte évalue l'association entre le niveau sérique de 25-hydroxyvitamine D, mesuré avant randomisation dans un essai évaluant le bévacizumab en traitement adjuvant, puis à 3 et 12 mois après le traitement, la durée de l'intervalle sans maladie et la survie globale
Background : Studies evaluating a relationship of vitamin D in patients with primary melanoma have consistently identified an inverse correlation with Breslow thickness, but an inconsistent impact on survival. Vitamin D in later stages of melanoma has been less studied. Methods : Vitamin D was measured in serum from 341 patients with resected stage IIB–IIIC melanoma recruited to the AVAST-M adjuvant melanoma randomised trial, collected prior to randomisation, then at 3 and 12 months. Vitamin D levels were compared with patient demographics, known melanoma prognostic factors, disease-free interval (DFI) and overall survival (OS). Results : A total of 73% patients had stage III melanoma, 32% were enroled (and therefore tested) >1 year after primary melanoma diagnosis. Median pre-randomisation vitamin D level was 56.5 (range 12.6–189.0 nmol/L). Vitamin D levels did not significantly vary over 12 months (p = 0.24). Individual pre-randomisation vitamin D levels did not differ significantly for Breslow thickness, tumour ulceration, or disease stage. Neither did pre-randomisation vitamin D predict for DFI (HR = 0.98 per 10 nmol/L increase; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93–1.04, p = 0.59) or OS (HR = 0.96 per 10 nmol/L increase, 95% CI 0.90–1.03, p = 0.31). For stage II patients, DFI improved with higher pre-randomisation vitamin D levels for those on bevacizumab (HR = 0.74 per 10 nmol nmol/L increase; 95% CI 0.56–0.97), but not for the observation arm (HR = 1.07 per 10 nmol/L increase; 95% CI 0.85–1.34). Conclusions : In this stage II/III melanoma cohort, vitamin D did not correlate with known prognostic markers, nor predict for DFI or OS, but there was some evidence of benefit for patients with stage II disease treated with bevacizumab.