Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in Childhood Cancer Survivors
Menée à partir d'une micro-simulation, cette étude estime le rapport coût-efficacité de 91 stratégies de dépistage du cancer colorectal par coloscopie chez les patients ayant survécu à un cancer pédiatrique
Background : Childhood Cancer Survivors (CCS) are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population, especially those previously exposed to abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy (APRT). However, the benefits and costs of CRC screening in CCS are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early-initiated colonoscopy screening in CCS.
Methods : We adjusted a previously validated model of CRC screening in the US population (MISCAN-Colon) to reflect CRC and other-cause mortality risk in CCS. We evaluated 91 colonoscopy screening strategies varying in screening interval, age to start, and age to stop screening, for all CCS combined, and for those treated with or without APRT. Primary outcomes were CRC deaths averted (compared to no screening) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per life-year gained (LYG) was used to determine the optimal screening strategy.
Results : Compared to no screening, the US Preventive Services Task Force’s average risk screening schedule prevented up to 73.2% of CRC deaths in CCS. The optimal strategy of screening every 10 years from age 40 to 60 averted 79.2% of deaths, with ICER of $67,000/LYG. Among CCS treated with APRT, colonoscopy every 10 years from age 35 to 65 was optimal (CRC deaths averted: 82.3%; ICER: $92,000/LYG), while among those not previously treated with APRT, screening from age 45 to 55 every 10 years was optimal (CRC deaths averted: 72.7%; ICER: $57,000/LYG).
Conclusions : Early initiation of colonoscopy screening for CCS is cost-effective, especially among those treated with APRT.
Journal of the National Cancer Institute , article en libre accès, 2018