Chronic oral anticoagulation and risk of prostate cancer: Evidence of detection bias
Menée aux Etats-Unis à partir des données 2000-2015 de la base Medicare portant sur 17 815 hommes traités par anticoagulants oraux et sur 356 300 témoins (âge : 65 ans ; durée médiane de suivi : 8,4 ans), cette étude met en évidence un biais de détection remettant en question l'association établie entre ces traitements et le risque de cancer de la prostate (24 815 cas)
Warfarin treatment has been associated with lower risks of prostate cancer, without a specified biological mechanism. Our study tested the hypothesis that reluctance to perform prostate biopsies in men who are anticoagulated results in lower rates of diagnosed prostate cancer, leading to an apparent protective effect. Rates of prostate biopsies have decreased from 2000 to 2015, allowing calendar time to be used as the intervention. In a national population-based sample of elderly men, our study compared trends in prostate cancer incidence between 17,815 men treated with chronic oral anticoagulation for prosthetic heart valve thromboprophylaxis and a general population comparison group of 356,300 men. Cancer events were based on administrative claims. Among men enrolled in 2000–2001 and followed through 2015, prostate cancer incidence was substantially lower in the anticoagulation group (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.80). Incidence decreased over time in the general population group to approach that of the anticoagulation group among men enrolled in 2008–2010 (IRR 0.86; 95% CI 0.71–1.04). Rates of prostate biopsies also decreased over time in the general population group to match the rate in the anticoagulation group. These results indicate that the apparent protective effect of warfarin treatment on the risk of prostate cancer is likely the result of detection bias from lower rates of biopsies among men who are anticoagulated.