Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for appendix neoplasms with peritoneal metastases: A propensity score analysis
Menée à partir de données portant sur 206 patients atteints d'un cancer de l'appendice avec métastases péritonéales et traités par chirurgie cytoréductive et chimiothérapie hyperthermique intrapéritonéale, cette étude évalue, en fonction du grade histologique de la tumeur et du point de vue de la durée d'hospitalisation, de la durée de séjour dans une unité de soins intensifs, de la survie sans récidive et de la survie globale, l'intérêt d'ajouter au traitement une chimiothérapie intrapéritonéale postopératoire
Introduction : Early post-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) can be used after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with resectable peritoneal metastases (PM). Whether EPIC adds any benefit is debatable. Methods : We performed a retrospective case-control analysis of patients with PM of appendiceal origin treated by CRS + HIPEC ± EPIC at Uppsala University Hospital between 2004 and 2012. The 206 patients were divided into two groups depending on if they received EPIC or not. The two groups were propensity-matched with a 1:1 ratio. The patients in the EPIC group were mostly operated in the first three years of the unit's experience. Results : After matching, 76 patients were left in each group. The groups were similar, except for the proportion of histological subtypes (p = 0.021) and chemotherapy agents used for HIPEC (0.017). Survival outcomes were stratified by histology. The patients who received EPIC had a longer hospital and ICU length of stay (15.71 vs 14.28 days, p = 0.049), (1.45 vs 1.05 days, p = 0.002), respectively. Post-operative complications were similar in both groups. Overall Survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ for the patients with low-grade histology. The patients with high-grade tumors who received EPIC had a significantly worse OS (p = 0.0088) while having the same RFS as the patients who did not receive EPIC. Conclusion : Our results suggest there is no benefit of EPIC in patients with advanced appendiceal tumors while increasing hospital and ICU length of stays. A suboptimal group matching might influence our results.