Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study in a Japanese high-volume center
Menée au Japon à l'aide de données 2014-2022 portant sur 255 patients atteints d'un adénocarcinome gastrique, cette étude compare 2 types de gastrectomie totale, l'une par voie laparoscopique et l'autre assistée par robot
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly popular worldwide in recent years. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) to figure out the advantages of RTG. Methods: The eligible cases in this study were patients who underwent RTG or LTG for gastric adenocarcinoma at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the underlying selection bias. Then, surgical outcomes of patients were analyzed to be compared. Results: Overall, 255 patients (LTG: 178, RTG: 77) were included in this study. After PSM, 73 patients in each arm were assigned for analysis. Operation time was longer in the RTG than in the LTG (373 vs 336 minutes, p < 0.01). However, the RTG was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stays (8 vs 9 days, p = 0.04) and lower incidence of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications (1% vs 11%, p = 0.03). More lymph nodes were harvested in the RTG (59 vs 47, p <0.01). Conclusions: Although RTG requires longer operation time, it has the potential to provide advantages to the patient such as quicker recovery, reduction in postoperative complication, or more yield number of lymph nodes. Regarding survival outcomes, further analysis with enough follow-up is needed.