• Traitements

  • Combinaison de traitements localisés et systémiques

  • Colon-rectum

Network Meta-analysis of RTCs for Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer

A partir d'une revue systématique de la littérature (19 essais randomisés, 7 037 patients), cette méta-analyse évalue l’efficacité de différents types de traitements néoadjuvants pour le cancer du rectum (chimioradiothérapie néoadjuvante standard, traitement néoadjuvant total de consolidation, traitement néoadjuvant total d'induction)

Background: This network meta-analysis examines the efficacy of different types of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for rectal cancer in improving clinical and pathologic outcomes.

Methods: PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed and Scopus including only randomized clinical trials comparing two or more NAT regimens for rectal cancer. A network meta-analysis was undertaken for the main outcomes, including pathological complete response (pCR), disease downstaging, R0 resection, permanent stoma, and major adverse effects. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROB-2 tool.

Results: 19 randomized controlled trials incorporating 7,037 patients (62% males) were included in the analysis. Compared to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT), consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.46-2.27; p<0.001) and induction TNT (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.31-2.26; p<0.001) had higher odds of achieving pCR. Induction TNT was also significantly associated with higher odds of major adverse effects than NCRT (OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.50-3.94; p<0.0001). Compared to NCRT, long course chemotherapy significantly increased the odds of R0 resection (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.13-1.78; p=0.002), while consolidation TNT significantly increased organ preservation rates (OR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.58-5.05; p<0.001). Short course radiotherapy doubled the odds of positive circumferential resection margins (CRM) compared to NCRT (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.11-3.55; p=0.02).

Conclusions: Consolidation and induction TNT were superior in achieving better pathological outcomes in rectal cancer, offering significant benefits over standard NCRT. However, they were associated with a higher risk of adverse effects. Conversely, short course radiotherapy was linked to higher rates of positive CRM.

European Journal of Surgical Oncology , résumé 2024

Voir le bulletin