• Traitements

  • Combinaison de traitements localisés et systémiques

  • Sarcome

A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma

Mené sur 50 patients atteints d'un sarcome des tissus mous et présentant un risque élevé de récidive (33 hommes, 17 femmes ; âge médian : 50,1 ans ; durée médiane de suivi : 30,5 mois), cet essai de phase II évalue la faisabilité, l'efficacité et la toxicité d'un protocole thérapeutique combinant une chimiothérapie néo-adjuvante de type EIA (étoposide-ifosfamide-doxorubicine-pegfilgrastime), une résection chirurgicale et une radiothérapie

BACKGROUND:The role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event, resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50 - 60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) has been applied to achieve pre-operative cytoreduction, assess chemosensitivity, and to eliminate occult metastasis. Here we report on the results of our non-randomized phase II study on neo-adjuvant treatment for high-risk STS. Patients and Methods: Patients with potentially curative high-risk STS (size >5cm, deep/extracompartimental localization, tumor grades II-III [FNCLCC]) were included. The protocol comprised 4 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (EIA, etoposide 125 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 4, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 4, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc day 5), definitive surgery with intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 adjuvant cycles of EIA.RESULTS:Between 06/2005 and 03/2010 a total of 50 subjects (male=33, female=17, median age 50.1 years) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 30.5 months. The majority of primary tumors were located in the extremities or trunk (92%), 6% originated in the abdomen/retroperitoneum. Response by RECIST criteria to neo-adjuvant CTX was 6% CR (n=3), 24% PR (n=12), 62% SD (n=31) and 8% PD (n=4). Local recurrence occurred in 3 subjects (6%). Distant metastasis was observed in 12 patients (24%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 83% and 68%, respectively. Multivariate analysis failed to prove influence of resection status or grade of histological necrosis on OS or DFS. Severe toxicities included neutropenic fever (4/50), cardiac toxicity (2/50), and CNS toxicity (4/50) leading to CTX dose reductions in 4 subjects. No cases of secondary leukemias were observed so far.CONCLUSION:The current protocol is feasible for achieving local control rates, as well as OS and DFS comparable to previously published data on neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. However, the definitive role of chemotherapy remains unclear in the absence of large, randomized trials. Therefore, the current regimen can only be recommended within a clinical study, and a possibly increased risk of secondary leukemias has to be taken into account. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382030, EudraCT 2004-002501-72

BMC Cancer

Voir le bulletin