• Traitements

  • Traitements systémiques : applications cliniques

  • Mélanome

The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases: a systematic review

A partir d'une revue systématique de la littérature publiée entre 2010 et 2019 (96 articles), cette étude évalue l'efficacité et la toxicité de diverses stratégies thérapeutiques chez des patients atteints d'un mélanome avec métastases cérébrales

Patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) still have a very poor prognosis. Several treatment modalities have been investigated in an attempt to improve the management of MBM. This review aimed to evaluate the impact of current treatments for MBM on patient- and tumor-related outcomes, and to provide treatment recommendations for this patient population. A literature search in the databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane was conducted up to January 8th, 2019. Original articles published since 2010 describing patient- and tumor-related outcomes of adult MBM patients treated with clearly defined systemic therapy were included. Information on basic trial demographics, treatment under investigation, and outcomes (overall and progression-free survival, local and distant control, and toxicity) were extracted. We identified 96 eligible articles, comprising 95 studies. A large variety of treatment options for MBM were investigated, either used alone or as combined modality therapy. Combined modality therapy was investigated in 71% of the studies and resulted in increased survival and better distant/local control than monotherapy, especially with targeted therapy or immunotherapy. However, neurotoxic side-effects also occurred more frequently. Timing appeared to be an important determinant, with the best results when radiotherapy was given before or during systemic therapy. Improved tumor control and prolonged survival can be achieved by combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy or targeted therapy. However, more randomized controlled trials or prospective studies are warranted to generate proper evidence that can be used to change the standard of care for patients with MBM. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

International Journal of Cancer 2019

Voir le bulletin