Avelumab plus sacituzumab govitecan versus avelumab monotherapy as first-line maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder Medley interim analysis
Mené sur 111 patients atteints d'un carcinome urothélial de stade localement avancé ou métastatique, cet essai de phase II évalue l'efficacité, du point de vue de la survie sans progression, et la toxicité de l'ajout du sacituzumab govitécan à l'avélumab en traitement d'entretien après un traitement de première ligne à base de sels de platine
Background: Avelumab first-line maintenance is a recommended treatment option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) without progression following platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). The JAVELIN Bladder Medley phase II trial is investigating the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with avelumab combined with other antitumor agents versus avelumab monotherapy. We report an interim analysis of avelumab plus sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus avelumab monotherapy.
Patients and methods: Patients with la/mUC without progression after first-line PBC were randomized 2 : 1 to receive avelumab (800 mg every 2 weeks) plus SG (10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles) or avelumab monotherapy (800 mg every 2 weeks). Primary endpoints are investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. For PFS and overall survival (OS), data in the avelumab monotherapy arm were extended per protocol using propensity score-weighted JAVELIN Bladder 100 data.
Results: At data cut-off (16 September 2024), 38/74 patients (51.4%) in the avelumab plus SG arm and 10/37 patients (27.0%) in the avelumab monotherapy arm were still receiving study treatment. Median PFS with avelumab plus SG versus avelumab monotherapy was 11.17 versus 3.75 months, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.76; prespecified efficacy boundary: HR ≤ 0.60]. OS data were immature; median OS was not reached versus 23.75 months, respectively (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.42-1.50). In patients treated with avelumab plus SG or avelumab monotherapy, any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 97.3% versus 63.9% (grade ≥3 in 69.9% versus 0%), respectively.
Conclusion: In patients with la/mUC without progression after first-line PBC, PFS was prolonged with avelumab plus SG versus avelumab monotherapy as maintenance treatment. TRAEs were more frequent with the combination and were consistent with known safety profiles of SG and avelumab. Combining avelumab with anti-Trop-2 antibody–drug conjugates may be a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes in la/mUC.
Annals of Oncology , résumé, 2025